Youngblood v. United States
This text of Youngblood v. United States (Youngblood v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 26-1468 Document: 4 Page: 1 Filed: 04/15/2026
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
ANDRE YOUNGBLOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________
2026-1468 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:25-cv-01031-KCD, Judge Kathryn C. Davis. ______________________
ON MOTION ______________________
PER CURIAM. ORDER The United States moves to dismiss Andre Youngblood’s appeal. Mr. Youngblood has not filed a re- sponse. We dismiss. Mr. Youngblood filed suit in the United States Court of Federal Claims, which entered judgment on Au- gust 14, 2025, dismissing for failure to pay the filing fee. On February 18, 2026, Mr. Youngblood filed his notice of Case: 26-1468 Document: 4 Page: 2 Filed: 04/15/2026
appeal (dated February 9, 2026) from “the order for dis- miss[ing] for not paying court fees.” ECF No. 1-2 at 1. An appellant typically has 60 days to file a notice of appeal following a final decision from the Court of Federal Claims. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 2107(b), 2522; Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B); Fed. Cir. R. 1(a)(1)(C). And the timely filing of a notice of appeal from that court’s judgment is a juris- dictional requirement that must be enforced. Marandola v. United States, 518 F.3d 913, 914 (Fed. Cir. 2008); cf. Hen- derson v. Shinseki, 562 U.S. 428, 438–39 (2011). Here, Mr. Youngblood’s notice of appeal is untimely as to the fi- nal judgment,1 such that we dismiss his appeal for lack of jurisdiction.2 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion to dismiss is granted. (2) Any other pending motions are denied.
1 Mr. Youngblood’s notice designates the dismissal order, which merged into the subsequent judgment. See Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(7).
2 Although it appears Mr. Youngblood was incarcer- ated at the time he filed his notice, he has not submitted any declaration or evidence establishing that he deposited his notice of appeal in the institution’s mail system with first-class postage prepaid on or before the last day for fil- ing. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Fed. Cir. R. 1(a)(1)(C). Case: 26-1468 Document: 4 Page: 3 Filed: 04/15/2026
YOUNGBLOOD v. US 3
(3) Each party shall bear its own costs. FOR THE COURT
April 15, 2026 Date
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Youngblood v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/youngblood-v-united-states-cafc-2026.