Youngblood v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Florida

Youngblood v. Thomas

342 So. 2d 968, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3826

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 17, 1977·No. No. 48677·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.

Youngblood v. Thomas, 342 So. 2d 968, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3826 (Fla. 1977).

Pincite

342 So. 2d 968 (Youngblood v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related