Youngblood v. North State Ford Truck Sales
367 S.E.2d 923, 322 N.C. 116
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Youngblood v. North State Ford Truck Sales. Read the opinion of the Court — 321 N.C. 380 →
Opinion
Charles YOUNGBLOOD
v.
NORTH STATE FORD TRUCK SALES and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Patterson, Dilthey, Clay, Cranfill, Summer & Hartzog, Raleigh, for defendants-appellants.
Teague, Campbell, Dennis & Gorham, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellee.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants in this matter for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 1988."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Youngblood v. North State Ford Truck Sales, 367 S.E.2d 923, 322 N.C. 116 (N.C. 1988).
367 S.E.2d 923 (Youngblood v. North State Ford Truck Sales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Foreclosure of Bean
367 S.E.2d 923 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1988)