Young Women's Christian Ass'n v. McGoldrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Young Women's Christian Ass'n v. McGoldrick

261 A.D. 1089, 26 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8908

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D. 1089 (Young Women's Christian Ass'n v. McGoldrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young Women's Christian Ass'n v. McGoldrick, 261 A.D. 1089, 26 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

In a certiorari proceeding brought to recover the amount of taxes paid pursuant to a Sales Tax Law from which petitioner was exempt, order denying motion of appellant to dismiss the proceeding reversed on the law, without costs, motion granted and proceeding dismissed, without costs. No timely application for refund was made pursuant to the provisions of section 10 of New York City Local Law No. 20 of 1934 (published as No. 21), as amended. (Rock Island, etc., R. R. v. United States, 254 U. S. 141; Balto. & Ohio R. R. v. United States, 260 id. 565; Kings County Savings Institution v. Blair, 116 id. 200, 205.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a certiorari proceeding brought to recover the amount of taxes paid pursuant to a Sales Tax Law from which petitioner was exempt, order denying motion of appellant to dismiss the proceeding reversed on the law, without costs, motion granted and proceeding dismissed, without costs. No timely application for refund was made pursuant to the provisions of section 10 of New York City Local Law No. 20 of 1934 (published as No. 21), as amended. (Rock Island, etc., R. R. v. United States, 254 U. S. 141; Balto. & Ohio R. R. v. United States, 260 id. 565; Kings County Savings Institution v. Blair, 116 id. 200, 205.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 1089, 26 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-womens-christian-assn-v-mcgoldrick-nyappdiv-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack