Young v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Young v. Young

34 A.D.2d 516, 308 N.Y.S.2d 640, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5390

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 5, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.D.2d 516 (Young v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. Young, 34 A.D.2d 516, 308 N.Y.S.2d 640, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5390 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment entered June 19, 1969 granting plaintiff separation from defendant and related relief• unanimously modified on the law and on the facts to the extent of allocating the sum awarded for the support and maintenance of plaintiff and the children to provide the sum of $300 per week for plaintiff’s support and $200 per week for the children’s support, and otherwise in all respects affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The trial court in its findings specifically allocated the support payments but improperly failed to do so in the judgment; and accordingly the judgment should be corrected properly to reflect the allocations as indicated above. Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., MeGivern, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment entered June 19, 1969 granting plaintiff separation from defendant and related relief• unanimously modified on the law and on the facts to the extent of allocating the sum awarded for the support and maintenance of plaintiff and the children to provide the sum of $300 per week for plaintiff’s support and $200 per week for the children’s support, and otherwise in all respects affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The trial court in its findings specifically allocated the support payments but improperly failed to do so in the judgment; and accordingly the judgment should be corrected properly to reflect the allocations as indicated above. Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., MeGivern, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.2d 516, 308 N.Y.S.2d 640, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-young-nyappdiv-1970.