Young v. Young
226 A.D. 714
Opinion
Interlocutory judgment reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the adultery of the defendant was not established. (See Pollock v. Pollock, 71 N. Y. 137; Nottingham v. Nottingham [ No. 1], 209 App. Div. 459.) Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur. The court disapproves of findings of fact numbered four and five.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Young v. Young, 226 A.D. 714 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).
226 A.D. 714 (Young v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pollock v. . Pollock
71 N.Y. 137 (New York Court of Appeals, 1877)
Nottingham v. Nottingham
209 A.D. 459 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)