Young v. Young
This text of 226 A.D. 714 (Young v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Interlocutory judgment reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the adultery of the defendant was not established. (See Pollock v. Pollock, 71 N. Y. 137; Nottingham v. Nottingham [ No. 1], 209 App. Div. 459.) Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur. The court disapproves of findings of fact numbered four and five.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 A.D. 714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-young-nyappdiv-1929.