Young v. Young

Superior Court of New Hampshire

Young v. Young

3 N.H. 345

Superior Court of New Hampshire·Decided February 15, 1826·Published

Opinion

By the court.

It is well settled, that it is a good plea in abatement of the writ, that the demandant or plaintiff, who sues without a guardian or next friend, is an infant. Chitty’s Pl. 436.—2 Saunders 117, f. note (1.)—1 Tidd’s Prae. 69.— [346] 7 Johnson 373, Schemerhorn vs. Jenkins.—2 Saunders 212.-Comyn’s Digest, Pleader 2 C. 1.

But it is very clear, that the writ may be amended. 1 Cowen 33; Ex parte Scott.—2 Saunders 212, and notes.—1 Tidd’s Prac. 69—12.

Leave to amend granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the court.

It is well settled, that it is a good plea in abatement of the writ, that the demandant or plaintiff, who sues without a guardian or next friend, is an infant. Chitty’s Pl. 436.—2 Saunders 117, f. note (1.)—1 Tidd’s Prae. 69.— [346] 7 Johnson 373, Schemerhorn vs. Jenkins.—2 Saunders 212.-Comyn’s Digest, Pleader 2 C. 1.

But it is very clear, that the writ may be amended. 1 Cowen 33; Ex parte Scott.—2 Saunders 212, and notes.—1 Tidd’s Prac. 69—12.

Leave to amend granted.

Young v. Young, 3 N.H. 345 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1826).

Pincite

3 N.H. 345 (Young v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.