Young v. Young

Missouri Court of Appeals

Young v. Young

475 S.W.3d 736, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1354, 2015 WL 9595411

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 8, 2015·No. WD 77961·Published

Opinion

[737] ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Russell Young (Husband) appeals the judgment of the trial court dissoMng his marriage to Shirley Young (Wife). He claims that the trial court erred in awarding Wife a portion of funds Husband received due to a disability award from the Veterans Administration, in awarding Wife one half of her attorney fees, and in awarding Wife maintenance. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)'.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[737] ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Russell Young (Husband) appeals the judgment of the trial court dissoMng his marriage to Shirley Young (Wife). He claims that the trial court erred in awarding Wife a portion of funds Husband received due to a disability award from the Veterans Administration, in awarding Wife one half of her attorney fees, and in awarding Wife maintenance. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)'.

Young v. Young, 475 S.W.3d 736, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1354, 2015 WL 9595411 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

475 S.W.3d 736 (Young v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.