Young v. Young
This text of 580 So. 2d 350 (Young v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm except for the following conceded by the parties:
The husband shall also be responsible for any income taxes incurred by the parties for the year 1984.
The judgment entered in favor of the wife’s accountant is null and void. Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum & Zavertnik, P.A. v. Baucom, 428 So.2d 1383, 1384 (Fla.1981) (charging lien protects an attorney’s right to be paid).1
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS OPINION.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
580 So. 2d 350, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5907, 1991 WL 98043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-young-fladistctapp-1991.