Young v. Young

719 A.2d 906, 247 Conn. 913, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 369
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 15, 1998
DocketSC 16000
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 719 A.2d 906 (Young v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. Young, 719 A.2d 906, 247 Conn. 913, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 369 (Colo. 1998).

Opinion

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 18387) is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Whether the defendants’ motion to reargue pursuant to Practice Book § 11-11 tolled the appeal period until the denial of that motion?

“2. Whether, under the circumstances surrounding this case, the defendants’ failure to post a bond within five days of the entry of judgment formed a proper basis for the dismissal of the defendants’ appeal?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Young v. Young
781 A.2d 342 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2001)
Young v. Young
733 A.2d 835 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
719 A.2d 906, 247 Conn. 913, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-young-conn-1998.