Young v. Wyman
This text of 566 N.E.2d 1157 (Young v. Wyman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. We agree with so much of the memorandum at the Appellate Division (159 AD2d 792) as held that the mere presence of an unrestrained dog on the street does not give rise to a presumption of negligence on the part of its owner.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Judge Kaye dissents and votes to reverse in an opinion in which Judge Simons concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
566 N.E.2d 1157, 76 N.Y.2d 1009, 565 N.Y.S.2d 752, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 4463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-wyman-ny-1990.