Young v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio
DecidedFebruary 12, 2021
Docket1:15-cv-00637
StatusUnknown

This text of Young v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution (Young v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution, (S.D. Ohio 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Aaron E. Young,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 1:15cv637

Neil Turner, Warden, North Central Correctional Institution, Judge Michael R. Barrett

Respondent.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on January 28, 2021 (Doc. 69). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R (Doc. 69) have been filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 69) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, Petitioner’s Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment (Doc. 68) is DENIED. This matter remains terminated on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Young v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-warden-madison-correctional-institution-ohsd-2021.