Young v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution

Fourth Circuit

Young v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution

235 F. App'x 91

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 30, 2007·No. No. 07-6176·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Larry Arnold Young, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Young v. Warden, Fed. Corr. Inst., No. 3:06-cv-00020-IMK, 2007 WL 189342 (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 22, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Larry Arnold Young, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Young v. Warden, Fed. Corr. Inst., No. 3:06-cv-00020-IMK, 2007 WL 189342 (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 22, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Young v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, 235 F. App'x 91 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

235 F. App'x 91 (Young v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related