Young v. Village of Lynbrook
This text of 234 A.D.2d 455 (Young v. Village of Lynbrook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Molloy, J.), dated August 15, 1995, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff was injured as a result of an accident precipitated by a police pursuit of a vehicle. The vehicle had committed a traffic infraction, and accelerated away from the police car after the driver of the police car had turned on its emergency lights and siren and directed the vehicle to pull over. Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1104 (e) precludes the imposition of civil liability for injury to a bystander for a police officer’s conduct in pursuing a suspected lawbreaker unless the officer acted in reckless disregard for the safety of others (see, Saarinen v Kerr, 84 NY2d 494). We agree with the Supreme Court that there is no evidence that the officer in question acted in reckless disregard for the safety of others, and thus, the defendant was entitled to summary judgment (see, Saarinen v Kerr, supra). Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 A.D.2d 455, 650 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-village-of-lynbrook-nyappdiv-1996.