Young v. Van Buren Circuit Judge
This text of 108 N.W. 506 (Young v. Van Buren Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an application for mandamus to compel respondent to frame an issue, or show cause why he should not do so, in a certain mandamus proceeding pending before him in said court wherein relator sought to compel the council of the village of G-obleville to approve a certain druggist’s bond presented by said relator. For the reason that it appears from the return of respondent circuit judge in the answer of said council that while said bond was in the custody of said village council, the same not having been accepted and approved, three of the four sureties thereto filed in writing with said council their withdrawal from said bond as sureties and notice of refusal to serve as such, therefore at the time the said mandamus was heard before respondent there was no proper bond to be passed upon by said council or said respondent, further proceedings would have been useless.
The writ is denied, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
108 N.W. 506, 145 Mich. 341, 1906 Mich. LEXIS 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-van-buren-circuit-judge-mich-1906.