Young v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development

78 F. App'x 553
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2003·No. 02-3117·Unpublished·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles and Angela Young appeal the district court’s 1 adverse disposition of their pro se housing-related claims. After careful review, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, Wilson Associates, LLC (the Wilson Firm), and Robert M. Wilson, Jr.; and the court’s dismissal of Ocwen Savings Bank. Although the district court did not enter any judgment as to defendant Greg Whitworth, we conclude that the district court intended to dismiss him from the case. See Small Engine Shop, Inc. v. Cascio, 878 F.2d 883, 886-87 (5th Cir.1989). We deny as moot Whit-worth’s motion to be added to Ocwen’s pleadings. We also deny the Youngs’ request to transfer this appeal to the Federal Circuit. The motion of Wilson and the Wilson firm to be dismissed is granted.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 78 F. App'x 553 (8th Cir. 2003).

78 F. App'x 553 (Young v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Firebaugh Canal Water District v. United States
70 Fed. Cl. 593 (Federal Claims, 2006)
Young v. United States
60 Fed. Cl. 418 (Federal Claims, 2004)