Young v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
This text of 78 F. App'x 553 (Young v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Charles and Angela Young appeal the district court’s 1 adverse disposition of their pro se housing-related claims. After careful review, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, Wilson Associates, LLC (the Wilson Firm), and Robert M. Wilson, Jr.; and the court’s dismissal of Ocwen Savings Bank. Although the district court did not enter any judgment as to defendant Greg Whitworth, we conclude that the district court intended to dismiss him from the case. See Small Engine Shop, Inc. v. Cascio, 878 F.2d 883, 886-87 (5th Cir.1989). We deny as moot Whit-worth’s motion to be added to Ocwen’s pleadings. We also deny the Youngs’ request to transfer this appeal to the Federal Circuit. The motion of Wilson and the Wilson firm to be dismissed is granted.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
. The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
78 F. App'x 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-united-states-department-of-housing-urban-development-ca8-2003.