Young v. Thurlo

34 Me. 594
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1852·Published

Opinion

The docket showing that this action had been continued “ to be defaulted,” the Court ordered a default to be entered, though against objection by the defendant, who therefore filed exceptions.

The exceptions being now withdrawn, the Court, on motion of the plaintiff, allowed “ double cost," on the ground that the exceptions; were frivolous.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. Thurlo, 34 Me. 594 (Me. 1852).

34 Me. 594 (Young v. Thurlo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.