Young v. Thompson
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Larry Arnold Young appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying [292]*292relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Young v. Thompson, No. 2:10-cv-00066-JPB-JSK, 2011 WL 3297493 (N.D.W.Va. July 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
458 F. App'x 291 (Young v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.