Young v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

CourtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts
DecidedJanuary 30, 2023
Docket1:22-cv-11802
StatusUnknown

This text of Young v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts (Young v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, (D. Mass. 2023).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS __________________________________________ ) SHAUNA YOUNG, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 22-11802-DJC ) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________)

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CASPER, J. January 30, 2023

For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Shauna Young additional time to file a complaint and resolve the filing fee. I. Background On October 20, 2022, Shauna Young, a resident of New Bedford, Massachusetts, proceeding pro se, filed a letter. D. 1. Young’s letter consists primarily of a recounting of events surrounding proceedings in Probate and Family Court in New Bedford as well as her unsuccessful efforts to secure custody of her children. Id. Young states that “[t]his civil LAWSUIT is being filed on behalf of [Young] and [her] children.” Id. at p. 2. Young further states that although she reviewed the court’s instruction guide to filing a civil action, she is “declaring [herself] exempt from the rules, regulations and protocols of ‘law’ in how to go about filing a civil lawsuit . . .” Id. at p. 1. Young did not file a complaint. She also did not pay the filing fee or a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Since the filing of this action, Young has filed numerous letters and a motion for a fair and speedy trial. D. 3 - 10. The letters primarily recount proceedings in state court as well as her efforts to secure the relief she seeks concerning her children. II. Discussion “A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the court.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 3.

Young’s letter does not constitute a complaint. If she wishes to pursue this action, she must file a complaint. The Court cannot consider a request for relief without an underlying complaint which contains a statement of the Court’s jurisdiction, “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief,” and a demand for relief. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The requirement to provide a “short and plain statement of the claim” means that the complaint must contain “enough detail to provide [each] defendant with ‘fair notice of what the . . . claim is and the grounds upon which it rests, ’” Silverstrand Invs. v. AMAG Pharm., Inc., 707 F.3d 95, 101 (1st Cir. 2013) (quoting Ocasio-Hernandez v. Fortuno-Burset, 640 F.3d 1, 12 (1st Cir. 2011)) (alteration in original), or, in other words, the statement of the claim “must ‘at least set forth

minimal facts as to who did what to whom, when, [and] where,’” Calvi v. Knox County, 470 F.3d 422, 430 (1st Cir. 2006) (quoting Educadores Puertorriqueños en Acción v. Hernandez, 367 F.3d 61, 68 (1st Cir. 2004)). In addition, a complaint should comply with other requirements set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The caption of the complaint “must name all the parties,” Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a). “A party must state its claims . . . in numbered paragraphs, each limited as far as practicable to a single set of circumstances.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(b). “Each allegation must be simple, concise, and direct.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(d)(1). The plaintiff must sign the complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). Further, if Young wishes to pursue this action, she must also pay a $350 filing fee and the $52 administrative fee or file a request to proceed without prepayment of the fee (often referred to as a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis). III. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s Motion, D. 5, for fair and speedy trial is DENIED. 2. If Young wishes to pursue this action she must, on or before February 21, 2023, (1) pay the $402 filing and administrative fees or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) file a complaint. 3. Failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal of the action without prejudice. The Clerk shall send Young an application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs, which Young may complete and file as a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

SO ORDERED. /s/ Denise J. Casper Denise J. Casper United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Calvi v. Knox County
470 F.3d 422 (First Circuit, 2006)
Ocasio-Hernandez v. Fortuno-Burset
640 F.3d 1 (First Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Young v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-the-commonwealth-of-massachusetts-mad-2023.