Young v. Superior Court of Kern County

California Supreme Court

Young v. Superior Court of Kern County

15 P.2d 165, 216 Cal. 784, 1932 Cal. LEXIS 646

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 11, 1932

DocketDocket No. S.F. 14778.

StatusPublished

This text of 15 P.2d 165 (Young v. Superior Court of Kern County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. Superior Court of Kern County, 15 P.2d 165, 216 Cal. 784, 1932 Cal. LEXIS 646 (Cal. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

Review to annul the order of the respondent court authorizing the plaintiff in an action in condemnation pending in said court entitled County of Kern, Plaintiff, v. Marie T. Ackerman et al.,Defendants (No. 25454), to take immediate possession of the property sought to be condemned after deposit in court as provided in section 14 of article I of the Constitution and section 28 of the Acquisition and Improvement Act of 1925 (Stats. 1925, p. 849). [1] The facts and the contentions of the petitioners are the same as those involved in John W. Young v.Superior Court, (L.A. No. 13888) ante, p. 512 [15 P.2d 163], this day decided. On the authority of that case the order sought to be annulled is affirmed. *Page 785

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Review to annul the order of the respondent court authorizing the plaintiff in an action in condemnation pending in said court entitled County of Kern, Plaintiff, v. Marie T. Ackerman et al.,Defendants (No. 25454), to take immediate possession of the property sought to be condemned after deposit in court as provided in section 14 of article I of the Constitution and section 28 of the Acquisition and Improvement Act of 1925 (Stats. 1925, p. 849). [1] The facts and the contentions of the petitioners are the same as those involved in John W. Young v.Superior Court, (L.A. No. 13888) ante, p. 512 [15 P.2d 163], this day decided. On the authority of that case the order sought to be annulled is affirmed. *Page 785

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 P.2d 165, 216 Cal. 784, 1932 Cal. LEXIS 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-superior-court-of-kern-county-cal-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack