Young v. Streeval
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
KAREEM AL-JAMAL YOUNG, Civil Action No. 7:23-cv-00529 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OPINION v. By: Michael F, Urbanski WARDEN J.C. STREEVAL., Chief United States District Judge Defendant(s).
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint, pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). By order entered August 16, 2023, the court directed plaintiff to submit within 30 days from the date of the order a statement of assets, an inmate account form, and a certified copy of plaintiff’s trust fund account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint, obtained from the appropriate prison official of each prison at which plaintiff is or was confined during that six-month period. Plaintiff was advised that a failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. More than 30 days have elapsed, and plaintiff has failed to comply with the described conditions. Accordingly, the court dismisses the action without prejudice and strikes the case from the active docket of the court. Plaintiff may refile the claims in a separate action once plaintiff is prepared to comply with the noted conditions. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and accompanying Order to plaintiff. ENTER: This 29th day of September, 2023. ye__ Digitally signed by Michael F. Urbanski Chief U.S. District Judge Date: 2023.09.29 09:21:26 -04'00' Chief United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Young v. Streeval (Young v. Streeval) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.