Young v. State

114 S.W.2d 548, 134 Tex. Crim. 126, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 232
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Young v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 139 Tex. Crim. 509
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 9, 1938·No. No. 19510.·Published

Opinion

Krueger, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of robbery by use of firearms; his punishment was assessed at death.

The record is before us without any bills of exception. The indictment seems to be in proper form and sufficient to charge the offense under the statute.

We do not deem it necessary to enter upon a detailed statement of the horrible crime disclosed by the statement of facts, but deem it sufficient to state that the testimony is sufficient to support the jury’s conclusion of the appellant’s guilt.

No error appearing in the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. State, 114 S.W.2d 548, 134 Tex. Crim. 126, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 232 (Tex. 1938).

114 S.W.2d 548 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.