Young v. State Road Commission

West Virginia Court of Claims

Young v. State Road Commission

4 Ct. Cl. 174

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedOctober 18, 1948

DocketNo. 639-S

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Ct. Cl. 174 (Young v. State Road Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. State Road Commission, 4 Ct. Cl. 174 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1948).

Pincite

Opinions

MERRIMAN S. SMITH, JUDGE.

Claimant Elizabeth Young, of Marietta, Ohio, was driving her automobile across the Williamstown-Marietta bridge, in Wood County, West Virginia, on June 2, 1948. The wooden floor at that time was in very bad condition and one of the spikes penetrated the left front tire and tube and damaged them beyond repair. By statute, code 17-4-88, Michie’s code 1474(15), provision is made for regular inspection of all bridges and for proper repairs to be made.

It is apparent from the record before this court that the floor of the bridge was in bad condition and not safe for the traveling public, and no contributory negligence was shown on the part of the claimant, and since this claim was concurred in by the state road commissioner and approved by the attorney general, an award in the amount of sixteen dollars and seventy cents ($16.70) is hereby granted by a majority of the court to claimant Elizabeth Young.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MERRIMAN S. SMITH, JUDGE.

Claimant Elizabeth Young, of Marietta, Ohio, was driving her automobile across the Williamstown-Marietta bridge, in Wood County, West Virginia, on June 2, 1948. The wooden floor at that time was in very bad condition and one of the spikes penetrated the left front tire and tube and damaged them beyond repair. By statute, code 17-4-88, Michie’s code 1474(15), provision is made for regular inspection of all bridges and for proper repairs to be made.

It is apparent from the record before this court that the floor of the bridge was in bad condition and not safe for the traveling public, and no contributory negligence was shown on the part of the claimant, and since this claim was concurred in by the state road commissioner and approved by the attorney general, an award in the amount of sixteen dollars and seventy cents ($16.70) is hereby granted by a majority of the court to claimant Elizabeth Young.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Ct. Cl. 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-state-road-commission-wvctcl-1948.