Young v. State
213 A.D.2d 1084, 625 N.Y.S.2d 997
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 17, 1995·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
—Motion to vacate automatic stay dismissed as unnecessary. Memorandum: The stay under CPLR 5519 (a) (1) stays only proceedings to enforce the order on appeal, not all proceedings. "CPLR 5519 does not * * * automatically stay a determination of the claimant’s damages” upon an appeal from a judgment on liability (Brock v State of New York, 97 Misc 2d 400, 402; see also, Baker v Board of Educ., 152 AD2d 1014). Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Balio, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Young v. State, 213 A.D.2d 1084, 625 N.Y.S.2d 997 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).
213 A.D.2d 1084 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lopez v. New York City Housing Authority
178 Misc. 2d 719 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1998)
Pickerell v. Town of Huntington
219 A.D.2d 24 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Schwartz v. New York City Housing Authority
219 A.D.2d 47 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)