Young v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Young v. State

503 S.W.3d 275, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1111, 2016 WL 6440415

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 1, 2016

DocketWD 78769

StatusPublished

This text of 503 S.W.3d 275 (Young v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. State, 503 S.W.3d 275, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1111, 2016 WL 6440415 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

William Young Jr. appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Young sought to set aside his conviction for possession of a controlled substance and twelve-year sentence. He contends that his guilty plea was involuntary because counsel failed to advise him that the State would be required to prove not only that he possessed items containing minute amounts of cocaine base but also that he knew of the presence of the controlled substance. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

William Young Jr. appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Young sought to set aside his conviction for possession of a controlled substance and twelve-year sentence. He contends that his guilty plea was involuntary because counsel failed to advise him that the State would be required to prove not only that he possessed items containing minute amounts of cocaine base but also that he knew of the presence of the controlled substance. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

503 S.W.3d 275, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1111, 2016 WL 6440415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-state-moctapp-2016.