Young v. State

212 A.2d 100, 239 Md. 708, 1965 Md. LEXIS 610
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJuly 28, 1965
DocketNo. 160
StatusPublished

This text of 212 A.2d 100 (Young v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. State, 212 A.2d 100, 239 Md. 708, 1965 Md. LEXIS 610 (Md. 1965).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

For the reasons given in Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U. S. 618, Nance v. Warden, 239 Md. 404, and Cowans and Hayes v. State, 238 Md. 433, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.1

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Linkletter v. Walker
381 U.S. 618 (Supreme Court, 1965)
Cowans and Hayes v. State
209 A.2d 552 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1965)
Nance v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
211 A.2d 739 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 A.2d 100, 239 Md. 708, 1965 Md. LEXIS 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-state-md-1965.