Home/Court of Appeals of Maryland/Young v. State

Young v. State

212 A.2d 100, 239 Md. 708, 1965 Md. LEXIS 610
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Young v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 234 Md. 125 →
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided July 28, 1965·No. No. 160·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

For the reasons given in Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U. S. 618, Nance v. Warden, 239 Md. 404, and Cowans and Hayes v. State, 238 Md. 433, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.1

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. State, 212 A.2d 100, 239 Md. 708, 1965 Md. LEXIS 610 (Md. 1965).

212 A.2d 100 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Linkletter v. Walker
381 U.S. 618 (Supreme Court, 1965)
Cowans and Hayes v. State
209 A.2d 552 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1965)
Nance v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
211 A.2d 739 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1965)