Young v. State
136 S.E. 556, 36 Ga. App. 273, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 9
Opinion
The evidence in this case, as set forth in the untraversed answer to the certiorari, authorized the trial judge, sitting without the intervention of a jury, to find that it excluded every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt. The particular facts of this case clearly distinguish it from that of Toney v. State, 30 Ga. App. 61 (116 S. E. 550), cited by counsel for the plaintiif in error. The overruling of the certiorari was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Young v. State, 136 S.E. 556, 36 Ga. App. 273, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 9 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).
136 S.E. 556 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thomas v. State
107 S.E.2d 687 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
Freeman v. State
67 S.E.2d 314 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)