Young v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Young v. State

189 So. 3d 947, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4828, 2016 WL 1235647

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 30, 2016

Docket2D15-1659

StatusPublished

This text of 189 So. 3d 947 (Young v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. State, 189 So. 3d 947, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4828, 2016 WL 1235647 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

MORRIS, Judge.

Jasson Young appeals the'revocations of his probation and his resulting prison sentences in four circuit court cases. We affirm without comment the revocations and sentences, but we remand for correction of his written sentences in two cases.

During the pendency, of this appeal, Young’s appellate counsel filed a motion to correct sentencing error in case numbers 00-21009 and 01-2491 pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b), arguing that Young’s sentences in those two cases should be designated as youthful offender sentences because he was originally sentenced as a youthful offender in those cases. See Yegge v. State, 88 So.3d 1058, 1059-60 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). In a timely order, the trial court granted the motion, ordering that Young “is sentenced to 205.8 months in the Department of Corrections as a Youthful Offender.” However, the order lists only ease number 00-21009 and not case number 01-2491. Accordingly, we remand for the'trial 'court to grant Young’s motion in case number 01-2491 and to enter amended sentences in both case numbers 00-21009 and 01-2491 reflecting Young’s youthful offender status.

Affirmed; remanded.

CÁSANUEVA and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORRIS, Judge.

Jasson Young appeals the'revocations of his probation and his resulting prison sentences in four circuit court cases. We affirm without comment the revocations and sentences, but we remand for correction of his written sentences in two cases.

During the pendency, of this appeal, Young’s appellate counsel filed a motion to correct sentencing error in case numbers 00-21009 and 01-2491 pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b), arguing that Young’s sentences in those two cases should be designated as youthful offender sentences because he was originally sentenced as a youthful offender in those cases. See Yegge v. State, 88 So.3d 1058, 1059-60 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). In a timely order, the trial court granted the motion, ordering that Young “is sentenced to 205.8 months in the Department of Corrections as a Youthful Offender.” However, the order lists only ease number 00-21009 and not case number 01-2491. Accordingly, we remand for the'trial 'court to grant Young’s motion in case number 01-2491 and to enter amended sentences in both case numbers 00-21009 and 01-2491 reflecting Young’s youthful offender status.

Affirmed; remanded.

CÁSANUEVA and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 So. 3d 947, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4828, 2016 WL 1235647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack