Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Young v. State

Young v. State

177 So. 3d 700, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16967, 2015 WL 7008024
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Young v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2781 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 12, 2015·No. No. 1D15-3350·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying the appellant’s motion without prejudice to the timely filing of a facially sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., BENTON and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. State, 177 So. 3d 700, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16967, 2015 WL 7008024 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

177 So. 3d 700 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.