Young v. State
73 So. 3d 825, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16752, 2011 WL 5109533
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 21, 2011·No. No. 5D10-2450·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm the defendant’s convictions for burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery with a dangerous weapon and for carjacking with a weapon. We certify conflict with Munoz v. State, 937 So.2d 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).
AFFIRMED; CONFLICT CERTIFIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Young v. State, 73 So. 3d 825, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16752, 2011 WL 5109533 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
73 So. 3d 825 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Young v. State
141 So. 3d 161 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2013)
People v. Morales
2012 COA 2 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2012)