Young v. State

13 So. 3d 537, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8702, 2009 WL 1872470
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 1, 2009·No. 3D07-2947·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Notwithstanding a contrary suggestion in ill-advised dicta in Gaskin v. State, 869 So.2d 646, 647 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004), there is a crime of burglary with intent to commit the underlying offense of resisting without violence, which occurs, as in this case, when a person fleeing from a lawful attempted arrest enters a structure without permission in order to evade capture. *538 See Jean-Marie v. State, 947 So.2d 484 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Nicarry v. State, 795 So.2d 1114 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Britton v. State, 604 So.2d 1288 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Burton v. State, 925 A.2d 503 (Del.2007); Patrick v. State, 922 A.2d 415 (Del.2007); State v. Williams, 229 N.J.Super. 179, 550 A.2d 1298 (1988). Because the evidence supports the jury’s finding that the defendant was guilty of that offense — and there is no harmful error — the judgment below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. State, 13 So. 3d 537, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8702, 2009 WL 1872470 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

13 So. 3d 537 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neal v. State
31 So. 3d 916 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)