Young v. State
978 So. 2d 869, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 5225, 2008 WL 957698
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Young v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 940 So. 2d 543 →
Opinion
We affirm the conviction and the sentence imposed by the court on the revocation of the defendant’s probation. However, we remand the case to the trial court for the entry of a written order specifying the conditions of probation the defendant violated. See Jones v. State, 638 So.2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Greene v. State, 919 So.2d 684 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Young v. State, 978 So. 2d 869, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 5225, 2008 WL 957698 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).
978 So. 2d 869 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. State
638 So. 2d 126 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Greene v. State
919 So. 2d 684 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)