Young v. State
868 So. 2d 1249, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3737, 2004 WL 573959
This text of 868 So. 2d 1249 (Young v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Young v. State, 868 So. 2d 1249, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3737, 2004 WL 573959 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
Opinion
We re-designate this appeal as being from an order denying a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) and affirm. Appellant’s claim that he was not present at a critical [1250]*1250stage of his ease is not cognizable by motion under rule 3.800(a).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
868 So. 2d 1249, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3737, 2004 WL 573959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.