Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Young v. State

Young v. State

868 So. 2d 1249, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3737, 2004 WL 573959
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 24, 2004·No. No. 4D04-394·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We re-designate this appeal as being from an order denying a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) and affirm. Appellant’s claim that he was not present at a critical [1250] stage of his ease is not cognizable by motion under rule 3.800(a).

STONE, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. State, 868 So. 2d 1249, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3737, 2004 WL 573959 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

868 So. 2d 1249 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.