Young v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Young v. State

362 So. 2d 433

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Young v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14670 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 31, 1978·No. No. JJ-382·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s denial of his motion to mitigate a ten year sentence for possession of a controlled substance, heroin. The trial court found that appellant’s assertions that he had been promised a maximum sentence of five years for the offense by the public defender representing him were not supported by testimony received at an evidentiary hearing on the motion. After a review of the transcript, we affirm the trial court’s order. Accordingly, the denial of appellant’s motion to mitigate sentence is affirmed.

SMITH, Acting C. J., and MELVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s denial of his motion to mitigate a ten year sentence for possession of a controlled substance, heroin. The trial court found that appellant’s assertions that he had been promised a maximum sentence of five years for the offense by the public defender representing him were not supported by testimony received at an evidentiary hearing on the motion. After a review of the transcript, we affirm the trial court’s order. Accordingly, the denial of appellant’s motion to mitigate sentence is affirmed.

SMITH, Acting C. J., and MELVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Young v. State, 362 So. 2d 433 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

362 So. 2d 433 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.