Young v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Young v. State

155 So. 925, 26 Ala. App. 705

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 27, 1934

Docket7 Div. 29.

StatusPublished

This text of 155 So. 925 (Young v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. State, 155 So. 925, 26 Ala. App. 705 (Ala. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

This ease on appeal needs no extended opinion. The evidence was in conflict upon the material inquiries involved upon the trial, and therefore presented a question for the jury to determine. There was ample evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury, and this, seems to be the only point of decision presented for our consideration.

• The affirmative charge as to the different counts of the indictment was properly refused. '

No error appearing, the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

This ease on appeal needs no extended opinion. The evidence was in conflict upon the material inquiries involved upon the trial, and therefore presented a question for the jury to determine. There was ample evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury, and this, seems to be the only point of decision presented for our consideration.

• The affirmative charge as to the different counts of the indictment was properly refused. '

No error appearing, the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 So. 925, 26 Ala. App. 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-state-alactapp-1934.