Young v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Young v. State

155 So. 925, 26 Ala. App. 705

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 27, 1934·No. 7 Div. 29.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

This ease on appeal needs no extended opinion. The evidence was in conflict upon the material inquiries involved upon the trial, and therefore presented a question for the jury to determine. There was ample evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury, and this, seems to be the only point of decision presented for our consideration.

• The affirmative charge as to the different counts of the indictment was properly refused. '

No error appearing, the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

This ease on appeal needs no extended opinion. The evidence was in conflict upon the material inquiries involved upon the trial, and therefore presented a question for the jury to determine. There was ample evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury, and this, seems to be the only point of decision presented for our consideration.

• The affirmative charge as to the different counts of the indictment was properly refused. '

No error appearing, the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Young v. State, 155 So. 925, 26 Ala. App. 705 (Ala. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

155 So. 925 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.