Young v. State

62 So. 1014, 8 Ala. App. 343, 1913 Ala. App. LEXIS 176
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 17, 1913·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

— This case is submitted on the merits, and on the motion of the Attorney General to strike the bill of exceptions. The motion must prevail, since it appears that the bill of exceptions was not presented to or filed with the trial judge Avithin 90 days from the day on which the judgment was entered; the judgment having been entered on November 12, 1912, and the bill presented to the trial judge on February 12, 1913, 92 days thereafter. — Code, § 3019.

We have examined the record proper, and find no errors therein. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. State, 62 So. 1014, 8 Ala. App. 343, 1913 Ala. App. LEXIS 176 (Ala. Ct. App. 1913).

62 So. 1014 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. McCree
105 So. 901 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)
Jefferson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.
93 So. 890 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1922)
Huntsville Knitting Mills v. Butner
76 So. 54 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1917)
English v. State
72 So. 292 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1916)
Southern Railway Co. v. Jordan
68 So. 418 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1915)