Young v. State

62 So. 1014, 8 Ala. App. 343, 1913 Ala. App. LEXIS 176
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 17, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 62 So. 1014 (Young v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. State, 62 So. 1014, 8 Ala. App. 343, 1913 Ala. App. LEXIS 176 (Ala. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

— This case is submitted on the merits, and on the motion of the Attorney General to strike the bill of exceptions. The motion must prevail, since it appears that the bill of exceptions was not presented to or filed with the trial judge Avithin 90 days from the day on which the judgment was entered; the judgment having been entered on November 12, 1912, and the bill presented to the trial judge on February 12, 1913, 92 days thereafter. — Code, § 3019.

We have examined the record proper, and find no errors therein. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. McCree
105 So. 901 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)
Jefferson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.
93 So. 890 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1922)
Huntsville Knitting Mills v. Butner
76 So. 54 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1917)
English v. State
72 So. 292 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1916)
Southern Railway Co. v. Jordan
68 So. 418 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 So. 1014, 8 Ala. App. 343, 1913 Ala. App. LEXIS 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-state-alactapp-1913.