Home/Supreme Court/Young v. Staples

Young v. Staples

278 U.S. 578, 49 S. Ct. 177, 1929 U.S. LEXIS 23
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 7, 1929
DocketNo. 600
StatusPublished

This text of 278 U.S. 578 (Young v. Staples) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. Staples, 278 U.S. 578, 49 S. Ct. 177, 1929 U.S. LEXIS 23 (1929).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the unprinted record herein submitted, finds that there is no jurisdiction for the appeal, and it is accordingly dismissed on the authority of § 238 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 938).

Mr. Henry Young, pro se. No appearance for appellees.

The costs already incurred herein by direction of the Court shall be paid by the Clerk from the special fund in his custody as provided in the order of October 29, 1926.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 U.S. 578, 49 S. Ct. 177, 1929 U.S. LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-staples-scotus-1929.