Young v. Southern Railway Co.

52 So. 19, 97 Miss. 483
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1910·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mayes, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The demurrer to the amended declaration filed in this case ought to have been overruled. The declaration contains much that is unnecessary for the purpose of stating a cause of action; but, taking into consideration the whole declaration, a case of negligence is sufficiently stated, making the railway company liable if the facts stated are sustained by the proof. Under the allegations the infant was more than a mere licensee, and the case of Railroad Company v. Arnola, 78 Miss. 788, 29 South. 768, 84 Am. St. Rep. 645, does not settle the law of this ease.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. Southern Railway Co., 52 So. 19, 97 Miss. 483 (Mich. 1910).

52 So. 19 (Young v. Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Illinois Central R. Co.
58 So. 2d 812 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1952)
Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Chambers
62 So. 724 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1912)