Young v. Selar Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Young v. Selar Realty Corp.

268 A.D.2d 583, 702 N.Y.S.2d 845, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 941

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 31, 2000·Published

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated December 4, 1998, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants failed to present admissible evidence showing that the plaintiffs action had no merit (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; [584]*584Pringle v New York City Hous. Auth., 260 AD2d 623). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Joy, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated December 4, 1998, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants failed to present admissible evidence showing that the plaintiffs action had no merit (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; [584]*584Pringle v New York City Hous. Auth., 260 AD2d 623). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Joy, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Young v. Selar Realty Corp., 268 A.D.2d 583, 702 N.Y.S.2d 845, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

268 A.D.2d 583 (Young v. Selar Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related