Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Young v. Selar Realty Corp.

Young v. Selar Realty Corp.

268 A.D.2d 583, 702 N.Y.S.2d 845, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 941
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 31, 2000
StatusPublished

This text of 268 A.D.2d 583 (Young v. Selar Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. Selar Realty Corp., 268 A.D.2d 583, 702 N.Y.S.2d 845, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated December 4, 1998, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants failed to present admissible evidence showing that the plaintiffs action had no merit (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; [584]*584Pringle v New York City Hous. Auth., 260 AD2d 623). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Joy, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pringle v. New York City Housing Authority
260 A.D.2d 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 A.D.2d 583, 702 N.Y.S.2d 845, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-selar-realty-corp-nyappdiv-2000.