Young v. Robinson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 30, 2006·No. 06-6301·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6301

ROBERT E. YOUNG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

IKE ROBINSON, Administrator,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

COUNTY OF ABBEVILLE,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (6:04-cv-00823-JFA)

Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 30, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert E. Young, Appellant Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr., CHAPMAN, HARTER & GROVES, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Robert E. Young appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Young v. Robinson,

No. 6:04-cv-00823-JFA (D.S.C. Jan. 26, 2006). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. Robinson, (4th Cir. 2006).

Young v. Robinson (Young v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related