Young v. Robertshaw Controls Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Young v. Robertshaw Controls Co.

108 A.D.2d 986

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 108 A.D.2d 986 (Young v. Robertshaw Controls Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. Robertshaw Controls Co., 108 A.D.2d 986 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied, without costs.

Motion to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion, ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: “Did this court err, as a matter of law, in modifying the orders entered December 7, 1983, on the law, by reversing so much thereof as granted plaintiff the right to seek punitive damages for loss of consortium and, as so modified, affirming the orders?” Kane, J. P., Casey, Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for reargument denied, without costs.

Motion to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion, ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: “Did this court err, as a matter of law, in modifying the orders entered December 7, 1983, on the law, by reversing so much thereof as granted plaintiff the right to seek punitive damages for loss of consortium and, as so modified, affirming the orders?” Kane, J. P., Casey, Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 A.D.2d 986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-robertshaw-controls-co-nyappdiv-1985.