Young v. Quatela

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Young v. Quatela

99 A.D.3d 795, 951 N.Y.2d 882

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 10, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 99 A.D.3d 795 (Young v. Quatela) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. Quatela, 99 A.D.3d 795, 951 N.Y.2d 882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

[796]*796Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Kevin Werner and Long, Tuminello, Besso, Seligman, Werner & Sullivan, LLR which was, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) to dismiss the third and fourth causes of action.

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Angiolillo, J.P, Hall, Cohen and Miller, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[796]*796Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Kevin Werner and Long, Tuminello, Besso, Seligman, Werner & Sullivan, LLR which was, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) to dismiss the third and fourth causes of action.

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Angiolillo, J.P, Hall, Cohen and Miller, JJ, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A.D.3d 795, 951 N.Y.2d 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-quatela-nyappdiv-2012.