Young v. Potter Title and Trust Co.
181 A. 44, 115 N.J.L. 518, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 336
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bodine, Heher, Pekskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Young v. Potter Title and Trust Co., 181 A. 44, 115 N.J.L. 518, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 336 (N.J. 1935).
181 A. 44 (Young v. Potter Title and Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Inventive Music, Ltd. v. Cohen
564 F. Supp. 914 (D. New Jersey, 1982)
In Re the Estate of Roche
109 A.2d 655 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1954)