Young v. Polack

3 Cal. 208
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1853
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 3 Cal. 208 (Young v. Polack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. Polack, 3 Cal. 208 (Cal. 1853).

Opinion

Heydenfeldt, Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court. Wells, Justice, concurred.

The plaintiff and defendant were joint tenants of an estate for years, and this bill was filed to compel the defendant to contribute for improvements made by plaintiff on the joint property.

The object of the appeal seems to be, to deprive the defendant of his interest in the lease. This of course it is impossible to do. The court below has gone very far, in rendering all the relief to which the plaintiff is entitled, and there is certainly nothing in the decree which can be the subject of complaint on his part.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Steen v. Craig
302 P.2d 435 (California Court of Appeal, 1956)
Atwood v. Little Bonanza Quicksilver Co.
110 P. 344 (California Court of Appeal, 1910)
Drake v. De Witt
82 P. 982 (California Court of Appeal, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Cal. 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-polack-cal-1853.