Young v. Noskov

299 A.D.2d 353, 749 N.Y.S.2d 155, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10470

This text of 299 A.D.2d 353 (Young v. Noskov) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. Noskov, 299 A.D.2d 353, 749 N.Y.S.2d 155, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10470 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Thomas Kurien appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), entered March 15, 2002, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the appellant’s motion as untimely. In light of this determination, we need not reach the appellant’s remaining contentions. O’Brien, J.P., Krausman, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
299 A.D.2d 353, 749 N.Y.S.2d 155, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-noskov-nyappdiv-2002.