Young v. New York City Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Young v. New York City Railway Co.

93 N.Y.S. 1151

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 29, 1905·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are of the opinion that none of the exceptions were well taken. The objection on page 5 of the stenographer’s minutes appears to have been made after the question had been asked and answered; and, moreover, under the circumstances disclosed by the evidence in the case, the plaintiff was entitled to recover, as one of the elements of the damages sustained by him, the amount paid by him fot a wagon to take the place of the wagon destroyed by the defendant. The evidence warrants the finding of the justice. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We are of the opinion that none of the exceptions were well taken. The objection on page 5 of the stenographer’s minutes appears to have been made after the question had been asked and answered; and, moreover, under the circumstances disclosed by the evidence in the case, the plaintiff was entitled to recover, as one of the elements of the damages sustained by him, the amount paid by him fot a wagon to take the place of the wagon destroyed by the defendant. The evidence warrants the finding of the justice. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Young v. New York City Railway Co., 93 N.Y.S. 1151 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

93 N.Y.S. 1151 (Young v. New York City Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.