Young v. Nat. Bk. of Lansdowne

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Young v. Nat. Bk. of Lansdowne

198 A. 139, 330 Pa. 128, 1938 Pa. LEXIS 571

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 19, 1938

DocketAppeal, 186

StatusPublished

This text of 198 A. 139 (Young v. Nat. Bk. of Lansdowne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. Nat. Bk. of Lansdowne, 198 A. 139, 330 Pa. 128, 1938 Pa. LEXIS 571 (Pa. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The principles of law governing this appeal are controlled by the case of Warner Brothers Theatres, Inc., v. Proffitt, 329 Pa. 316, the only difference being that the tenant in that case purchased the mortgage on the leased premises, foreclosed, and bought in the property, while here the tenant purchased the property from the mortgagee who bid it in on foreclosure, in accordance with an agreement entered into between tenant and mortgagee prior to the sheriff’s sale.

Decree affirmed at appellants’ cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The principles of law governing this appeal are controlled by the case of Warner Brothers Theatres, Inc., v. Proffitt, 329 Pa. 316, the only difference being that the tenant in that case purchased the mortgage on the leased premises, foreclosed, and bought in the property, while here the tenant purchased the property from the mortgagee who bid it in on foreclosure, in accordance with an agreement entered into between tenant and mortgagee prior to the sheriff’s sale.

Decree affirmed at appellants’ cost.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A. 139, 330 Pa. 128, 1938 Pa. LEXIS 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-nat-bk-of-lansdowne-pa-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack