Young v. Nakamoto

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided July 16, 2019·No. SCPW-19-0000448·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 16-JUL-2019 09:48 AM

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

CHRISTOPHER YOUNG, Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE HENRY T. NAKAMOTO, Judge of the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit, State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge,

and

POMAIKAI HOLDINGS, INC., dba RE/MAX PROPERTIES; et al., Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CIV. NOS. 17-1-0412 and 19-1-0047)

ORDER DENYING “MOTION TO OBJECTION AND REQUEST OF THIS COURT TO RECONSIDER ITS ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S APPEAL DATED 02-JUL-2019, PURSUANT TO H.R.A.P. 40, REGARDING H.R.C.P. RULE 60(b)(3)” (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Christopher Young’s

“Motion to Objection and Request of this Court to Reconsider its

Order Denying Petitioner’s Appeal Dated 02-Jul-2019, Pursuant to

H.R.A.P. 40, Regarding H.R.C.P. Rule 60(b)(3)”, filed on July 10,

2019 (“motion for reconsideration”), the documents attached

thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for

reconsideration is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 16, 2019.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. Nakamoto, (haw 2019).

Young v. Nakamoto (Young v. Nakamoto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.