Young v. Moody

Indiana Supreme Court

Young v. Moody

14 Ind. 571

DecidedAugust 23, 1860

StatusPublished

This text of 14 Ind. 571 (Young v. Moody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. Moody, 14 Ind. 571 (Ind. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant made no exception—took no steps whatever to have the error, if there were any, corrected or brought to the attention of the Court in any way. No motion for a new trial, or to correct error. The record presents no question.

-Lee and G. W. Spitler, for the appellants. J. E. McDonald and A. L. Roadie, for the appellees.

The judgment is affirmed with 1 per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant made no exception—took no steps whatever to have the error, if there were any, corrected or brought to the attention of the Court in any way. No motion for a new trial, or to correct error. The record presents no question.

-Lee and G. W. Spitler, for the appellants. J. E. McDonald and A. L. Roadie, for the appellees.

The judgment is affirmed with 1 per cent, damages and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 Ind. 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-moody-ind-1860.