Young v. Mitsubishi Motors North America Corporation Inc

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided March 31, 2021·No. 2:19-cv-02070·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINIGTON AT SEATTLE 6

7 ROBERT YOUNG, individually, and as legal guardian of I.R.Y., a minor, NO. 2:19-cv-02070-RSL 8 Plaintiffs, STIPULATED MOTION TO INCREASE 9 THE NUMBER OF ALLOWED v. DEPOSITIONS 10

MITSUBISHI MOTORS NORTH AMERICA

11 CORPORATION, INC., a California corporation; and MITSUBISHI MOTORS 12 CORPORATION, a foreign corporation,

13 Defendants.

14 I. STIPULATION 15 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(2), Plaintiff Robert Young, individually, 16 and as legal guardian of I.R.Y., minor (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”) and Defendants 17 Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc. and Mitsubishi Motors Corporation (hereinafter 18 collectively referred to as “Defendants”), respectfully and jointly move the Court for entry of an 19 order expanding the number of allowed depositions to twenty-five per side, excluding experts. 20 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2) presumptively limits the number of allowed 21 depositions in a civil matter to ten per side. FED. R. CIV. P. 30(a)(2). However, as discovery

STIPULATED MOTION TO INCREASE THE CHRISTIE LAW GROUP, PLLC NUMBER OF ALLOWED DEPOSITIONS - 1 2100 WESTLAKE AVENUE N., SUITE 206 (Case No. 2:19-cv-02070 RSL) SEATTLE, WA 98109 206-957-9669 1 progresses in a case, “it will sometimes unveil a need to allow depositions beyond those 2 contemplated” in the Federal Rules. See Thykkuttathil v. Keese, 294 F.R.D. 601, 602 (W.D. Wash. 3 2013). Upon such an event, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(2) allows that “the court may 4 alter the limits in these rules on the number of depositions.” Id. “The breadth and complexity of 5 the case is a factor for the Court to consider in determining whether enlargement is warranted.” Id. 6 Counsel for the parties have conferred and agree that good cause exists to increase the 7 number of allowed depositions, as set forth below: 8 1. This is a complex products liability case involving multiple parties and serious 9 alleged injuries. The case arises out of a single-vehicle accident involving a 1995 Mitsubishi

10 Montero that was hit by a falling tree. Five people were inside the vehicle, two of whom died. 11 I.R.Y. was the left rear occupant in the vehicle, and she sustained serious injuries as a result of the 12 accident, including paralysis. 13 2. During the course of discovery, approximately fifty fact witnesses have been 14 identified, including but not limited to at least eight bystanders, twenty-six first responders, 15 investigators and emergency personnel, five family members and caregivers of I.R.Y., and six 16 individuals with knowledge regarding the subject vehicle’s chain-of-custody. 17 3. To date, the parties have deposed, noted for deposition, and/or are in the process of 18 scheduling the depositions of the following fact witnesses:

19  Robert Young (Plaintiff) – Deposed February 4, 2021; 20  Trooper Michael Welander (Washington State Patrol Trooper; certified collision technical specialist; drafted accident investigation report) – 21 Deposed February 24, 2021;

STIPULATED MOTION TO INCREASE THE CHRISTIE LAW GROUP, PLLC NUMBER OF ALLOWED DEPOSITIONS - 2 2100 WESTLAKE AVENUE N., SUITE 206 (Case No. 2:19-cv-02070 RSL) SEATTLE, WA 98109 206-957-9669 1  Sergeant Gailin Hester (Washington State Patrol Sergeant; assisted with 2 the accident investigation) – Deposed March 2, 2021;

3  Ranger John Bowie (United States Park Ranger; assisted with the accident investigation) – Deposed March 3, 2021; 4  Danielle Young (Plaintiff Robert Young’s daughter; I.R.Y.’s aunt and 5 prior caregiver; owner of the subject vehicle) – Deposed March 10, 2021; 6  Michael Clabaugh (bystander; first on scene; removed I.R.Y. from the 7 subject vehicle) – Deposed March 17, 2021;

8  Katherine Dolashanty (I.R.Y.’s caretaker) – Noted for deposition on March 31, 2021; 9  Sarah Clabaugh (bystander; first on scene; treated and cared for I.R.Y. 10 immediately upon removal from the subject vehicle) – in the process of scheduling; 11  Fire Chief Sam Phillips (responded to the accident scene; oversaw the 12 response and investigation) – in the process of scheduling; and

13  Ranger Brian Wray (United States Park Ranger; assisted with accident investigation) – in the process of scheduling. 14

4. However, critical evidence—including the subject vehicle—is no longer available 15 to the parties. Further, photographs were not taken at the accident scene until after evidence was 16 moved and/or altered. Therefore, in order to adequately obtain evidence regarding the accident 17 and Plaintiffs’ allegations, the parties will need to depose additional fact witnesses—specifically, 18 those individuals who were on-scene immediately after the accident occurred and have first-hand 19 knowledge of the relevant evidence, as well as others with knowledge of the subject vehicle and 20 I.Y.R.’s alleged injuries. This includes, but is not necessarily limited to: 21

STIPULATED MOTION TO INCREASE THE CHRISTIE LAW GROUP, PLLC NUMBER OF ALLOWED DEPOSITIONS - 3 2100 WESTLAKE AVENUE N., SUITE 206 (Case No. 2:19-cv-02070 RSL) SEATTLE, WA 98109 206-957-9669 1  Yasmin Martinez – 911 caller; on scene of accident;

2  Kayla Losfgren – 911 caller; on scene of accident;

3  Joyce Bos-Lopez – bystander; on scene of accident;

4  John Ides – bystander; on scene of accident;

5  Carla Ides – bystander; on scene of accident;

6  Terry Wopperer – bystander; on scene of accident;

7  Haley Domning – bystander; on scene of accident; helped care for I.R.Y. until first responders arrived; 8

 Trooper Addison Schahfer – assisted at the accident scene; completed 9 the field diagram; assisted with preparing the vehicle analysis of the vehicle; assisted with measuring the scene; 10

 Trooper Mike Jensen – assisted at the accident scene; completed the 11 field diagram; assisted with preparing the vehicle analysis of the vehicle; assisted with measuring the scene; 12

 Firefighter/Paramedic Allen Hunt – treated I.R.Y. on scene and 13 transported her to the hospital;

14  Firefighter/EMT Neil Crumley – treated I.R.Y. on scene and transported her to the hospital; 15

16  EMT J. Stonig – treated I.R.Y. on scene and transported her to the hospital; 17  Fire Captain/EMT Shane Simpson – led team that stabilized the subject 18 vehicle and extricated roof;

19  Lt. Firefighter Al Oman – assisted in stabilization of the subject vehicle and extrication of the roof; and 20  Assistant Fire Chief Dan Huff – responded to the scene; tasked with 21 overseeing operations as well as triage and extrication.

STIPULATED MOTION TO INCREASE THE CHRISTIE LAW GROUP, PLLC NUMBER OF ALLOWED DEPOSITIONS - 4 2100 WESTLAKE AVENUE N., SUITE 206 (Case No. 2:19-cv-02070 RSL) SEATTLE, WA 98109 206-957-9669 1 5. In addition to the above, the parties anticipate each designating experts in multiple 2 disciplines with respect to both liability and damages. 3 6. Due to the vast number of fact witnesses involved, and because the testimony of 4 these witnesses will be essential to the development of the parties’ expert reports, the parties agree 5 that the presumptive limit of depositions is insufficient. 6 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 7 The number of allowed depositions will be expanded to twenty-five per side, excluding 8 experts. 9 IT IS SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. Mitsubishi Motors North America Corporation Inc, (W.D. Wash. 2021).

Young v. Mitsubishi Motors North America Corporation Inc (Young v. Mitsubishi Motors North America Corporation Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thykkuttathil v. Keese
294 F.R.D. 601 (W.D. Washington, 2013)